# data[].attributes.blurb.html
DumpsCafe offers the latest Salesforce Integration-Architect dumps created by experienced Salesforce professionals and certification experts. These practice questions are aligned with the latest exam objectives and cover all important topics included in the actual certification exam. Candidates can strengthen their understanding of Salesforce APIs, middleware integration, authentication methods, security models, event-driven architecture, and data synchronization through real exam-based questions, verified answers, and detailed explanations. This structured preparation helps learners build strong conceptual clarity and improve exam performance effectively.

https://www.dumpscafe.com/Braindumps-Integration-Architect.html

# data[].attributes.slidedeck.data[].slides[].desc.html
Salesforce Integration-Architect Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch204) Version: Demo [ Total Questions: 10] Web: www.dumpscafe.com Email: support@dumpscafe.com

# data[].attributes.slidedeck.data[].slides[].desc.html
IMPORTANT NOTICE Feedback We have developed quality product and state-of-art service to ensure our customers interest. If you have any suggestions, please feel free to contact us at feedback@dumpscafe.com Support If you have any questions about our product, please provide the following items: exam code screenshot of the question login id/email please contact us at support@dumpscafe.com and our technical experts will provide support within 24 hours. Copyright The product of each order has its own encryption code, so you should use it independently. Any unauthorized changes will inflict legal punishment. We reserve the right of final explanation for this statement.

# data[].attributes.slidedeck.data[].slides[].desc.html
Pass Exam Salesforce - Integration-Architect Category Breakdown Category Number of Questions Design Integration Solutions 8 Maintain Integration 1 Build Solution 1 TOTAL 10 Question #:1 - [Design Integration Solutions] Northern Trail Outfitters has recently implemented middleware for orchestration of services across platforms. The Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system being used requires transactions be captured near real-time at a REST endpoint initiated in Salesforce when creating an Order object. Additionally, the Salesforce team has limited development resources and requires a low-code solution. Which option should fulfill the use case requirements?12 A. Use Remote Process Invocation Fire and Forget pattern on insert on the Order object using Flow Builder. B. Implement a Workflow Rule wi5th Outbound Messaging to send SOAP messages to the designated endpoint. C. Implement Change Data Capture on the Order object and leverage the replay ID in the middleware solution. Answer: A Explanation To satisfy a requirement for near real-time updates to an ERP system while adher9ing to a low-code constraint, the architect must leverage Salesforce’s modern declara10tive automation tools. The goal is to initiate an outbound signal that the existing middleware can then orchestrate and deliver to the ERP’s REST endpoint. The Remote Process Invocation—Fire and Forget pattern is perfectly suited for this scenario. In this pattern, Salesforce sends a message to an external system and does not wait for a functional response. This is ideal for “capturing” transactions in an ERP where the primary goal is record synchronization rather than a real-time calculation return. By using Flow Builder, the team can implement a record-triggered flow on the Order object. This flow can be configured to execute “Actions” that send data to the middleware via External Services or standard HTTP Callouts (Beta/GA features in modern Flow), which requires zero Apex coding. Option B, Outbound Messaging, is a legacy declarative tool that is highly reliable but has a significant limitation: it natively sends messages in SOAP format. Since the requirement specifically specifies a REST endpoint, using Outbound Messaging would require additional transformation logic in the middleware, making it a less direct architectural fit than a modern Flow-based REST call. Option C, Change Data Capture (CDC), is a highly scalable, event-driven mechanism, but it is typically considered more complex to implement and maintain. It requires the middleware to manage “Replay IDs” and subscribe to a streaming channel, which often requires more specialized development effort on the middleware side compared to a simple HTTP POST from a Flow. For a team with limited development resources, Flow Builder provides the most accessible and maintainable path to achieving near real-time integration. Verified Solution - 100% Result 1 of 9

# data[].attributes.slidedeck.data[].slides[].desc.html
Pass Exam Salesforce - Integration-Architect Question #:2 - [Maintain Integration] A company accepts payment requests 24/7. Once the company accepts a payment request, its service level agreement (SLA) requires it to make sure each payment request is processed by its Payment System. The company tracks payment requests using a globally unique identifier created at the Data Entry Point. The company’s simplified flow is as shown in the diagram. The company encounters intermittent update errors when two or more processes try to update the same Payment Request record at the same time. Which recommendation should an integration architect make to improve the company’s SLA and update conflict handling? A. Middleware should coordinate request delivery and payment processing. B. Payment System and Middleware should automatically retry requests. C. Payment System sho46uld process a payment request only once. Answer: A Explanation In high-concurrency environments like 24/7 payment processing, a common architectural failure is “race conditions,” where multiple threads attempt to update the same record simultaneously. To resolve this while strictly adhering to a Service Level Agreement (SLA), the Integration Architect must shift the responsibility of orchestration to a central “nervous system”—the Middleware (e.g., MuleSoft or an ESB). Verified Solution - 100% Result 2 of 9

# data[].attributes.slidedeck.data[].slides[].desc.html
Pass Exam Salesforce - Integration-Architect According to Salesforce Integration best practices, Middleware coordination is essential for managing the state and sequencing of asynchronous messages. By having the Middleware coordinate request delivery, it can implement a “Sequential Processing” or “First-In-First-Out” (FIFO) queue logic. This ensures that even if the Data Entry Point pushes requests at high speed, the Middleware can throttle or serialize the calls to the Payment System, preventing the record-locking errors and update conflicts mentioned in the scenario. Furthermore, the globally unique identifier created at the Data Entry Point allows the Middleware to perform Idempotency checks. If a duplicate request arrives or an error occurs, the Middleware can use this ID to verify the status before attempting another update, ensuring that the “exactly-once” processing requirement of the SLA is met without creating duplicate payment records or conflicting status updates. While Option B suggests retries—which are necessary for a “Fire-and-Forget” pattern—retrying without central coordination often exacerbates update conflicts rather than solving them. Option C (processing once) is a result of a well-designed system, but it does not provide the mechanism to handle the specific update conflicts described. By recommending that the Middleware coordinate the entire flow, the architect provides a robust solution that manages delivery, handles retries gracefully, and ensures data integrity across the system landscape. Question #:3 - [Design Integration Solutions] A new Salesforce program has the following high-level abstract requirement: Business processes executed on Salesforce require data updates between some internal systems and Salesforce. Which relevant details should a Salesforce integration architect seek to specifically solve for the integration architecture needs of the program? A. Core functional and non-functional requirements for User Experience design, Encryption needs, Community, and License choices B. Source and Target system, Directionality, and data volume & transformation complexity, along with any middleware that can be leveraged C. Integration skills, SME availability, and Program Governance details Answer: B Explanation To translate abstract business needs into a functional Integration Architecture, an architect must move beyond “what” the business wants to “how” the data will technically flow. The details in Option B represent the fundamental building blocks of any integration design. Source and Target Systems: Determining which systems are involved dictates the available APIs (REST, SOAP, Bulk) and required security protocols (OAuth, Mutual SSL). Directionality: Knowing if the update is unidirectional or bidirectional is critical for record mastering, identifying the “System of Record,” and preventing infinite data loops. Verified Solution - 100% Result 3 of 9

# data[].attributes.slidedeck.data[].slides[].desc.html
Pass Exam Salesforce - Integration-Architect Data Volume: This is a primary driver for selecting the Integration Pattern. High volumes (millions of records) require the Bulk API, while low-volume, real-time updates are better suited for Streaming or REST APIs. Transformation Complexity: If data must be heavily massaged or merged from multiple sources, it justifies the need for Middleware (ESB/iPaaS). Option A focuses on user interface and licensing, which are implementation details rather than architectural integration requirements. Option C deals with project management and resource allocation. While these are important for the project’s success, they do not help the architect decide between a Request-Reply or Fireand-Forget pattern. By focusing on systems, data direction, and volume, the architect ensures that the proposed solution is technically viable, scalable, and adheres to Salesforce platform governor limits. Question #:4 - [Design Integration Solutions] Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) uses Salesforce to track leads, opportunities, and order details that convert leads to customers. However, orders are managed by an external (remote) system. Sales reps want to view and update real-time order information in Salesforce. NTO wants the data to only persist in the external system. Which type of integration should an architect recommend to meet this business requirement? A. Data Synchronization B. Data Virtualization C. Process Orchestration Answer: B Explanation The requirement to view and update data in real-time while ens5uring the data only persists in the external system is the definition of a Data Virtualization pattern. In this architectural model, Salesforce does not store a local copy of the data (which would be Data Synchronization), but instead acts as a window into the external system of record. An Integration Architect implements Data Virtualization primarily through Salesforce Connect. This tool allows the external system’s order table to be represented as an External Object in Salesforce. Because the data is retrieved on-demand via a web service call (typically using the OData protocol), it is always “realtime.” Furthermore, since Salesforce Connect supports writeable external objects, sales reps can update the order information directly from the Salesforce UI, and those changes are sent back to the external system immediately without being saved to the Salesforce database. This approach is superior to Data Synchronization (Option A) in this specific use case because it eliminates the need for data storage costs and the complexity of keeping two databases in sync. It is also distinct from Process Orchestration (Option C), which focuses on the sequencing of tasks across multiple systems rather Verified Solution - 100% Result 4 of 9

# data[].attributes.slidedeck.data[].slides[].desc.html
Pass Exam Salesforce - Integration-Architect than the real-time presentation of external data. By utilizing Data Virtualization, NTO achieves a seamless user experience where external orders look and feel like native Salesforce records while strictly adhering to the “no persistence” constraint. Question #:5 - [Design Integration Solutions] UC has an API-led architecture with three tiers. Requirement: return data to systems of engagement (mobile, web, Salesforce) in different formats and enforce different security protocols. What should the architect recommend? A. Implement an API Gateway that all systems of engagement must interface with first. B. Enforce separate security protocols and return formats at the first tier of the API-led architecture. Answer: B Explanation In a standard API-led connectivity model, the First Tier (Experience APIs) is responsible for tailoring data for specific systems of engagement. The Experience APIs take the core data from the lower tiers and transform it into the specific return formats (e.g., JSON for mobile, XML for legacy web) and security protocols (e.g., OAuth for Salesforce, API Keys for web) required by each consumer. Option B correctly identifies that these transformations and security enforcements should happen at this outer layer. While an API Gateway (Option A) can provide generic security and rate limiting, it is the Experience API layer that provides the functional transformation and specific protocol requirements defined by the business needs of the engagement systems. Question #:6 - [Design Integration Solutions] Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) uses different shipping services for each of the 34 countries it serves. Services are added and removed frequently. Sales representatives globally need to select between valid service (s) for the customer’s country and request shipping estimates. Which solution should an architect propose? A. Store shipping services in a picklist that is dependent on a country picklist. B. Invoke middleware service to retrieve valid shipping methods. C. Use Platform Events to construct and publish shipper-specific events. Answer: B Explanation When external services are highly volatile (added/removed frequently), the goal is to decouple the Salesforce UI from the underlying service logic. An Integration Architect should propose invoking a middleware service to retrieve the valid shipping methods. Verified Solution - 100% Result 5 of 9

# data[].attributes.slidedeck.data[].slides[].desc.html
Pass Exam Salesforce - Integration-Architect By using middleware (such as an ESB or MuleSoft) as an abstraction layer, Salesforce doesn’t need to “know” the details of the 34 different shipping providers. When a sales rep selects a country, Salesforce makes a single callout to the middleware. The middleware then performs the routing logic to identify which shippers are active for that region and returns a standardized list to Salesforce. Option A is a “maintenance nightmare”; every time a shipping service changes in any of the 34 countries, an admin would need to manually update picklist values and dependencies in Salesforce, which is not scalable. Option C (Platfor31m Events) is an asynchronous pattern unsuitable for a real-time “request-reply” scenario where a rep is waiting for an estimate during a live customer interaction. Utilizing middleware centralizes the logic, simplifies Salesforce configuration, and allows NTO to change shipping providers without any code deployments or metadata updates in the Salesforce org. Question #:7 - [Design Integration Solutions] A large consumer goods manufacturer operating in multiple countries is planning to implement Salesforce for its sales and support operations globally. The Manufacturer has the following security requirements: Internal users from each country have to be authenticated with their local active directory. Customers can create their own login or use Google login. Partners have to be authenticated through a central system which is to be determined. Internal users will have access to the central Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with their credentials maintained in the ERP system. Additional internal systems will be integrated with Salesforce for sales and support business processes. Which requirement should the integration architect evaluate while designing the integration needs of this project? A. Evaluate Salesforce native authentication mechanism for all users including customers and partners. B. Evaluate the build of a custom authentication mechanism for users in each country and support for customers and partners. C. Consider a third-party single sign-on (SSO) solution supporting all user authentication including customer and partner. Answer: C Explanation Managing identity across a global enterprise with diverse user personas (Employees, Customers, Partners) requires a centralized Identity and Access Management (IAM) strategy. In a landscape involving multiple local Active Directories, social logins (Google), and a central ERP system, attempting to manage authentication natively within Salesforce or through custom-built local silos would result in high technical debt and security vulnerabilities. Verified Solution - 100% Result 6 of 9

# data[].attributes.slidedeck.data[].slides[].desc.html
Pass Exam Salesforce - Integration-Architect The architect should recommend a third-party Single Sign-On (SSO) solution, acting as a central Identity Provider (IdP). This IdP serves as the orchestration layer for all authentication requests. For Internal Users: The IdP can federate with the various local Active Directories, allowing users to log in with their existing corporate credentials. For Customers: The IdP can handle “Social Sign-On” (OpenID Connect) with Google and manage self-registration. For Partners: It provides the “central system” required for their authentication. By using a central SSO solution, Salesforce acts as a Service Provider (SP). When a user attempts to access Salesforce, the request is redirected to the IdP via the SAML 2.0 or OpenID Connect protocol. Once the IdP validates the user against the appropriate backend (AD, Google, or its own directory), it sends a secure assertion back to Salesforce to grant access. Furthermore, this central IdP can facilitate access to the ERP system and other internal systems. If these systems support SAML, the same SSO session used for Salesforce can be extended to them, providing a true single sign-on experience. This architecture centralizes security auditing, simplifies user de-provisioning (the “kill switch” effect), and ensures a consistent user experience across the global manufacturing landscape. Implementing a thir2d-party IdP is the industry-standard approach for complex integrations where security, scalabi3lity, and multi-protocol support are primary requirements. Question #:8 - [Build Solution] Northern Trail Outfitters uses a custom Java application to display code coverage and test results for all enterprise applications. Which Salesforce API should an integration architect use to include Salesforce in this application? A. Metadata API B. Analytics REST API C. Tooling API Answer: C Explanation The Tooling API is specifically designed for developer-centric tools that need fine-grained access to Salesforce metadata and runtime information. It exposes specialized objects like ApexCodeCoverage, ApexCodeCoverageAggregate, and ApexTestResult. These objects allow external applications to query the results of test runs and specific line-by-line coverage metrics. While the Metadata API (Option A) is used for deployments, it does not provide the same granular query access to test execution results. The Tooling API is the industry standard for integrating Salesforce into enterprise CI/CD pipelines and quality dashboards. Question #:9 - [Design Integration Solutions] Verified Solution - 100% Result 7 of 9

# data[].attributes.slidedeck.data[].slides[].desc.html
Pass Exam Salesforce - Integration-Architect A customer is evaluating the Platform Events solution and would like help in comparing/contrasting it with Outbound Messaging for real-time/near-real time needs. They expect 3,000 customers to view messages in Salesforce. What should be evaluated and highlighted when deciding between the solutions? A. In both Platform Events and Outbound Messaging, the event messages are retried by and delivered in sequence, and only once. Salesforce ensures there is no duplicate message delivery. B. Message sequence is possible in Outbound Messaging, but not guaranteed with Platform Events. Both offer very high reliability. Fault handling and recovery are fully handled by Salesforce. C. Both Platform Events and Outbound Messaging offer declarative means for asynchronous near-real time needs. They aren’t best suited for real-time integrations. Answer: C Question #:10 - [Design Integration Solutions] A subscription-based media company’s system landscape forces many subscribers to maintain multiple accounts and to log in more than once. An Identity and Access Management (IAM) system, which supports SAML and OpenID, was recently implemented to improve the subscriber experience through self-registration and single sign-on (SSO). The IAM system must integrate with Salesforce to give new self-service customers instant access to Salesforce Community Cloud. A. OpenID Connect Authentication Provider and Just-in-Time (JIT) provisioning1 B. OpenID Connect Authentication Provider and Registration Handler2 C. SAML SSO and Registration Handler Answer: B Explanation To provide “instant access” and a seamless experience for Community (Experience Cloud) users, the architect must choose an authentication and provisioning strategy that handles user creation on-the-fly. While both SAML and OpenID Connect (OIDC) are viable for SSO, OpenID Connect is the modern standard for consumer-facing “Social” or external identity integrations because it is built on OAuth 2.0. The critical component for “self-service” is the Registration Handler. When an OpenID Connect Authentication Provider is configured in Salesforce, you must associate it with an Apex class that implements the Auth.RegistrationHandler interface. This handler is executed during the SSO flow if the user does not already exist. It provides the architect with full programmatic control to: Match the incoming identity to an existing Contact or Account. Create a new Contact record if one doesn’t exist. Provision a new User record with the correct Profile, Permission Sets, and Locale settings. Verified Solution - 100% Result 8 of 9

# data[].attributes.slidedeck.data[].slides[].desc.html
Pass Exam Salesforce - Integration-Architect Link the User to the correct Account hierarchy, which is vital for Community security models. Option A suggests Just-in-Time (JIT) provisioning, which is a declarative way to create users. However, JIT is often too rigid for Experience Cloud requirements, as it has limited ability to perform complex data lookups or handle the specific linking of Contacts to Accounts required for external users. Option C is technically mismatched in common Salesforce terminology; while SAML uses JIT, the Registration Handler is the native, specific mechanism designed to work with Authentication Providers (like OIDC). By using B, the company ensures that a subscriber logging in for the first time via the IAM system is instantly and accurately provisioned in Salesforce, eliminating the need for multiple accounts. Verified Solution - 100% Result 9 of 9

# data[].attributes.slidedeck.data[].slides[].desc.html
About dumpscafe.com dumpscafe.com was founded in 2007. We provide latest & high quality IT / Business Certification Training Exam Questions, Study Guides, Practice Tests. We help you pass any IT / Business Certification Exams with 100% Pass Guaranteed or Full Refund. Especially Cisco, CompTIA, Citrix, EMC, HP, Oracle, VMware, Juniper, Check Point, LPI, Nortel, EXIN and so on. View list of all certification exams: All vendors We prepare state-of-the art practice tests for certification exams. You can reach us at any of the email addresses listed below. Sales: sales@dumpscafe.com Feedback: feedback@dumpscafe.com Support: support@dumpscafe.com Any problems about IT certification or our products, You can write us back and we will get back to you within 24 hours.