No two people are exactly alike, just as no two fingerprints are identical. Each person thinks differently, has a certain worldview that may differ from the others. In fact, this is the main reason for conflicts. Many people behave the same way in all situations, with no idea that it is possible to choose different behavioral strategies and resolve conflicts more effectively. I’m Dustin Bratten, a writer from an “essay writer free online” type of service, let’s find out.
A strategy that involves pursuing one’s own interests to the detriment of one’s interlocutor’s interests. This means that the person is confident in his rightness and wants to single-handedly win the dispute. The main actions that a person will take in a rivalry: tight control over the behavior of the opponent, pressure and the use of tricks, provocation, and manipulation, unwillingness to enter into a constructive dialogue. This method of conflict resolution has more disadvantages than advantages and is not suitable at all if you want to maintain a relationship with your interlocutor.
The exact opposite of the strategy of rivalry, which is characterized by unconditional acceptance of the position of the conflicter. A person puts their needs and desires on the back burner in order to avoid a conflict situation. Usually, people with low self-esteem and not being able to defend their position do this. They are characterized by the following actions: agreement with the demands of the conflicter, absence of claims, and displaying flattery. These tactics can be used when the subject of the conflict is not important to you and you want to maintain a constructive relationship.
Man tries in every way to avoid conflict and postpone an important decision for later. He not only shows no interest in the conflict situation but also ignores the position of the opponent. It is characteristic of him to defiantly walk away, refuse to interact, deny the importance of the conflict, deliberately slow down the decision process, suppress emotional reactions. This strategy can be useful only in one case if you do not intend to continue the relationship with the opponent.
A tactic in which the interests of both parties are partially satisfied. A person tries to balance positions, offers counter options, seeks to find a mutually beneficial solution. This tactic is fair to both parties to the dispute, but it is not the endgame. As a result, it is still necessary to return to the essence of the conflict and find an optimal solution.
The subject of the conflict seeks to resolve the situation in such a way as to fully satisfy his needs and the opponent. That is, to find a solution that will be beneficial to all. For this tactic is peculiar to analyze the subject of the conflict, calculate the resources of the participants to find a common benefit, listen carefully to the position of the interlocutor. This strategy has almost one advantage - it promotes the development of trust and long-term interpersonal relationships, making mutually beneficial decisions. But not in all conflicts it is possible to fully satisfy the basic desires of each participant, in which case the principle of cooperation will only complicate the situation.