A presentation at FOSDEM in in Brussels, Belgium by Eriol Fox
Welcome to Design contributions to OSS: Learnings from the Open Design project.
My name is Eriol Fox. I use They/Them/Their’s pronouns and was lead designer at Ushahidi.
I’ve been working in the digital product design and UX space for the last 10 years, since before UX had a name.
I’ve also been involved in Humanitarian work and community work for 7 years and 2 years in the FOSS (Free and Open Source Space)
Unfortunately in OSS there is an absence of contributions that aren’t code, and many OSS projects don’t think outside of their typical ‘developer bubble’. But Open Source Software, especially humanitarian projects, are in dire need of multi-functional product cycle support, including design, in order to make critical, needed software usable in truly difficult situations.
In 2018 and & 2019 we piloted two design jams/hackathons where we tested whether bringing together designers around Ushahidi’s crisis communication tool TenFour to look at challenges local to Berlin and Seattle which were floods and landslides.
We put out a public event once in Berlin as a stand alone organised event and in Seattle at the IxDA conference: one of many design events for interaction designers from around the world.
We found the other people like me here, and also many individuals across many other functions in digital technology wanting opportunities and structures like OSS is for developers too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iX1HZOtN2Js
We discovered that there are a huge amount of designers working in corporations and for-profits wanting to work on a project in their ‘spare time’.
We started Open Design to try to begin to investigate and solve the question of specifically, ‘Why aren’t there more designers in Open Source?’
We started the Open design project which was a collaboration between Ushahidi, Adobe and Global design agency Designit to start to understand why designers and, by extension other digital functions like product management, data analysts etc. aren’t participating as actively in OSS as those who code are.
A lot of what we learned about designers trying to move into and thrive in OSS spaces apply to other functions that are characterised by ‘not predominantly coding based’
Open design is a project that was born from these three organisations wanting to make a difference in the OSS space with the design community through investigation, tools, methodology and frameworks.
The first phase of Open Design was largely this as well as the process of us analysing and improving on the format in the open.
When speaking to designers and other roles about what OSS can be they’re often surprised by the diversity of projects. Especially those that are on the humanitarian side seeing these as potentially more accessible than the ones that are about tech for people who build tech.
Education not teaching designers what it is and how design can be involved. Although some design institutions are introducing OSS modules for students Darmstadt Uni.
Agency/Inhouse/organisation not promoting it as a viable source of development for design skills.
Ref: The genius interviews: https://github.com/ushahidi/opendesign/issues/4
Github sends a message in the way that it’s set up that suggests it’s a place only for those who can code in some way.
Historically, that may be the case but more and more designers or coders are becoming hybrids or interested in the process of how tech is built.
But while people who code might learn how to use Github, terminal and how to set up their own repos to look at OSS project designers aren’t often equipped with the knowledge on how to do this or even the ways in which to find comprehensive guides in order to set up an instance. If a designer can’t see or experience the OSS through a ‘user facing’ interface or if there are parts of the OSS that are inaccessible unless you can set up an instance then that’s a part the designer will not have access to in order to contribute.
When speaking with people that work on OSS projects and ‘maintain’ them. They often hear ‘design’ and immediately think either:
This leaves out a huge part of why design is becoming one of the most needed functions in software recently. Design can offer so much to digital (and non-digital) products and projects than the visual design.
But, just like development and software has it’s own jargon and ‘club’ mentality so the hidden jargon and world of design has been hard for others to break into. Leaving a limited and short sighted view of what design can offer an OSS project.
This view of design is not to be scoffed and mocked at. It’s to understand and work towards how we can as a design community open up are practices and the benefits of our craft of design to those that are just beginning to learn how it can help OSS.
You can apply this level of understanding of design to the level of understanding about any other aspect of a humanitarian project. Programs, Research, M&E. When we don’t make spaces for people with these expertises to contribute to OSS we limit the capacity for Humanitarian OSS to succeed in a community-led building way.
But a problem in OSS is that typically the pieces of work, called ‘issues’ are very specific and very granular tasks. An example might be ‘Design a form capture for new volunteers that includes Name, Email and Address’ This ‘issue’ is largely dictating what is needed and leaves little room for exploration of what is the core need.
Why is this form needed? Why those data points? How should this be stored?
Designers in particular need the context surrounding a task or problem to effectively design for it in a sustainable way. Not all designers operate this way but the ones that have a healthy amount of curiosity about the wider impact of what they design.
As a predominantly coders space OSS issues sometimes lack a flexibility that could offer a different kind of solution to the proposed problem. There’s also the risk that you won’t engage the designers wide skill set, user insight and contextual design expertise as well as lacking in enthusiasm.
That’s if there are issues for design (or other functions!) at all in the project!
On the flip side, when you have a challenge that is is not directly attached to a specific issue or scope of work for the OSS and then designers tend to create designs not grounded in the reality of the current technology function often called ‘Design fiction’.
What we wanted to figure out is how to achieve actionable design contribution to current issues/tickets in the OSS repo while engaging designers in the OSS’s purpose.
There’s a process in coding and software development called ‘version control’ which is where multiple people can work from a single source at a time by ‘branching’ their own contained version of the main project to work on and then merge that branch into the main source when they’ve finished.
However, if another person in their own ‘branch’ has worked on the same part but done something slight different a lot of ways of coding will flag and show notifications for ‘conflicts’ and ask the people involved to take a look at the conflicts and reconcile them. This is how software developers stop overwriting each other work while working on code on their own machines and it’s also part of the way they track and maintain ‘versions’ of the project.
In design theres no real way to know if another designer working on the same project has changed something in a file that you have also changed. You have to create a whole seperate file, have a conversation and point out the differences and discuss them. This is also often why designers tend to work on separate parts of a project than the same to avoid conflicting or duplicate design work. We need ways to work with this remotely across timezones and borders if design for OSS is to be successful but also, as designers, understand that someone looking at our ‘master’ design file and changing something to suggest something better isn’t a threat to our design but a way of collaborating and globalizing our design to make it better and more relevant for everyone around the world.
Versioning for designers means digging into why sometimes we are particular and precious about holding our design files tight an not allowing them to be more flexible and participatory.
Designing for crisis communication open source TenFour with survivors of the Kerala floods in Southwest India.
Designing for crisis communication open-source TenFour with against typhoon crisis alongside farmers in rural Taiwanese farmers.
Our design activities during the workshops were focussed on building team cohesion and entering into the problem space of the OSS. Not about particularly complicated or fancy methods that could isolate and put-off any non-designers or early career designers.
We did Empathy mapping, Defining the problem, Ideation, Story boarding and skteching and prototyping.
We purposefully invited witnesses of the problem the OSS product tried to solve. So in Bangalore it was a researcher from the Kerala area involved with the CMID and in Taipeu is was a volunteer co-ordinator and a farm owner.
There’s a balance between an issue for development and an issue for designers and we got extremely close to the balance between what devs need and what designers need to explore a problem.
The outcomes of the workshop were some kind of prototypes.
To help increase and sustain design contributions to OSS tools like Ushahidi.
To support a community of collaborative, peer-led designers who learn skills and new ways of working together.
To build the understanding of OSS in the design community as alternative to ‘speculative’ ‘design for free projects especially for early career designers.
To help OSS projects understand design beyond graphics and UI and into the broad skills design can offer OSS.
To support OSS projects in building and receiving design contributions that are meaningful to their projects.
If designers want to get involved in OSS projects then we need more OSS projects involved with us!
Open methodology, frameworks and processes to use and remix: github.com/ushahidi/opendesign @erioldoesdesign @opendesignis @fosdem @opensrcdesign
Ushahidi builds OSS humanitarian tools, remotely for some of the most marginalized people across the globe. To tackle these systemic problems with how to ‘open source’ a design effort and bring the community along with the ‘on-staff’ Ushahidi designers, we’ve been piloting a series of design events on our OSS crisis communication tool TenFour with our partners Designit and Adobe. Together, we’re looking to solve the problems with how open source design can work by engaging through meaningful technology that makes a difference in the world.
We’re here to take you through that journey and what we’ve learnt about design contributions to OSS.
In this session, we’ll briefly cover the history of the project and the main problems we attempted to solve and we’ll present the learning and adaptions to our workshop framework and methodology that aims to engage design teams and individuals that are not yet ‘on-board’ with OSS as an ethos or movement.
Looking into some the abstract deeper motivations for design professionals to contribute but also some practical tips on structuring issues, labelling and maintaining design (and extended functions like research, UX and product management) you’ll leave with a set of tools and methods you can apply to your OSS to engage with designers.
for free. You
can too.